Contact Congress about H.Res. 672: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; and for other purposes.

The House would get a set path for debating a major energy and water spending bill. Lawmakers would have limited time and limited chances to change it. The rule also sets up votes on three Bureau of Land Management land-use plans.

Modern Action explains legislation in plain English, helps you choose whether to support, oppose, or ask for changes, and drafts a message tied to the bill, your stance, and the elected officials who can act on it.

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; and for other purposes. is a House bill waiting for floor action. The latest recorded action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Latest action on H.Res. 672: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Who this affects: This bill mainly affects House members and the people following the bills it controls. Members would have less freedom to offer floor changes unless the Rules Committee approved them. Agencies, states, communities, energy interests, and conservation groups could be affected later, depending on how the House votes on the spending bill and the land-use resolutions.

Why this matters: This matters because House rules can shape what lawmakers actually get to vote on. The resolution could speed up action on a major spending bill and three land-use votes. It could also keep many proposed changes from reaching the floor. The land-use effects would not happen from this rule alone; they would depend on later votes on H.J. Res. 104, 105, and 106.

Key provisions in H.Res. 672

• The Speaker could move the House into the Committee of the Whole to work on H.R. 4553. That bill funds energy and water development for fiscal year 2026.
• The House could not use normal procedural objections to block debate on H.R. 4553. The rule also blocks some objections under House rules that limit policy language and certain spending items in funding bills.
• General debate on H.R. 4553 would last one hour. The time would be split evenly between the chair and top minority member of the Appropriations Committee, or people they choose.
• Members could offer only three kinds of changes to H.R. 4553: amendments listed in the Rules Committee report, approved grouped amendments, and short debate-only amendments.
• Each listed amendment must come up in the order set by the Rules Committee report. Only the named member may offer it, and members cannot split it into separate votes.

How Modern Action helps you take action on H.Res. 672

You do not have to start with a blank letter. Modern Action turns the bill, your position, and the relevant congressional context into a message you can edit and send. The goal is to make contacting Congress clear, specific, and useful without forcing you to parse bill text or figure out the right office on your own.

Questions people ask about H.Res. 672

What is H.Res. 672?

The House would get a set path for debating a major energy and water spending bill. Lawmakers would have limited time and limited chances to change it. The rule also sets up votes on three Bureau of Land Management land-use plans.

How do I support or oppose H.Res. 672?

Choose support, oppose, or ask for changes on Modern Action. The action flow drafts the message for you and keeps the wording tied to this bill.

Who should I contact about H.Res. 672?

Modern Action uses your location to route the action to the congressional offices relevant to the bill and your representation.

Can Modern Action explain H.Res. 672 before I act?

Yes. Modern Action gives you a plain-English summary, current status, and action context before you send anything.